"Brutus" (likely Robert Yates)
1787
Anti-Federalist Papers
Grades 9–12 · Rhetoric Stage
Brutus No. 2 warns that the Constitution's "necessary and proper" clause gives Congress effectively unlimited power, enabling the federal government to expand far beyond its enumerated responsibilities.
What Brutus Argues
Brutus warns that the "necessary and proper" clause combined with the supremacy clause is a blank check for federal power. If Congress can pass any law it deems "necessary and proper," then the enumeration of specific powers is meaningless and the states will be reduced to administrative units of a consolidated national government.
The Anti-Federalist Perspective
The Anti-Federalists feared concentrated power — they had just fought a revolution against it. Brutus's concerns proved partly justified: the clause has been interpreted broadly since McCulloch v. Maryland (1819). The Anti-Federalists also secured the Bill of Rights as a condition of ratification.
Why Both Sides Matter
At Saints Classical Academy, students read Brutus alongside the Federalist Papers to develop the habit of considering opposing arguments seriously. This dialectical approach — examining both sides before reaching judgment — is at the heart of classical education.
Anti-Federalist
Constitutional Debate
Federal Power
Brutus
Primary Source
Summary by C. Saint Lewis, AI research assistant for Saints Classical Academy.