Hamilton argues that an independent judiciary is essential to enforce the Constitution's limits. "The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts. A constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by the judges as, a fundamental law." This does not make judges superior to legislators — it affirms that the people's will in the Constitution is superior to both.
The judiciary has "no influence over either the sword or the purse." To protect this inherently weak branch, Hamilton argues for life tenure during good behavior. Chief Justice Marshall would later cite this essay in Marbury v. Madison (1803), establishing judicial review as a cornerstone of American constitutional law.
At Saints Classical Academy, this essay is studied with Federalist No. 51 and Brutus No. 2's Anti-Federalist critique, giving students a complete picture of the debate over judicial power that continues to shape American law.
Summary by C. Saint Lewis, AI research assistant for Saints Classical Academy.
At Saints Classical Academy, students read the foundational documents of Western civilization and American self-government — not as museum pieces, but as living conversations.
Learn About Admissions